This is
my take on KONY 2012 using the Potter’s Box Process Approach from Media Now. This is on Page 476 of the Seventh Addition, just in
case you are curious. Although the
way I use it is a lot different from the book example, I think it’s a good way
for those of us who view media (not just create it) to think through ethical
situations we see in media daily.
In Quadrant One, we first have to take the situation at
hand and identify all of the facts.
Honestly, one of the most frustrating parts of this KONY 2012 saga is
that it is so unclear what is fact and what is fiction! Of all of the media outlets and
coverage out there on this subject, it is extremely unclear to me who is
ethical and who is not. Although
there are not many, these are the facts I am confident about:
1.
Invisible Children, INC. created the video KONY
2012
2.
Joseph Kony has committed thousands and thousands
of war crimes over decades in Uganda
Those
are literally the only things I can think of surrounding this topic that I know
to be definite truths. I don’t
know about anyone else, but that just seems kind of crazy to me.
In Quadrant Two of Potter’s Box, we identify our
values. By doing so, we have to
decide whether the situation at hand is actually helpful, or whether the tools
used are unethical/in bad taste. I
think that the actual video KONY 2012 is a very powerful tool for a seemingly
great cause. This video single
handedly shows the power that we have in the world of media. The real question is, when is that power
truly used for good and not outweighed by bad? Like most things in today’s media, the scandal and possible “conspiracies”
surrounding an issue have outshined the original problem at hand. No longer is the KONY 2012 video merely
about putting a stop to something that is evil and against most people’s
morals, it has become a media storm of conspiracy, mud slinging, lies and
scandal.
We use Quadrant Three to look for general principles to
make sense of the ethical issue at hand.
I think that the Social Contract Theory is a great way to easily outline
what has happened with this video.
As someone who is a philanthropist and honest person in their daily
life, we expect the people involved and the organization Invisible Children to
be the same. If we plan to give
time or money to these people, we expect them to uphold values that are in line
with ours. When stories begin to
develop, such as the news that founder Jason Russell was arrested for being
naked and possible under the influence of something in public recently (yikes),
and countless of other things surrounding the KONY 2012 campaign we start to
question whether Invisible Children is upholding their end of the contract.
Lastly, in Quadrant 4, we have to make our final decision
and clarify our loyalties. Do we
believe the media that reports Invisible Children and KONY 2012 to be a scam
purely to make profit, or do we decide that Invisible Children really is
helping war efforts in Uganda and other African countries and they do deserve
our help? Well, for me this
Quadrant remains undecided…
(Word Count 560)